The scan found a broad set of mature technical, behavioural and transparency signals. Its TLS certificate was valid at scan time. Registration records show the domain has existed for more than two years. The accessible homepage exposed a contact route and linked policy or company information. Confidence is high based on 7 distinct evidence groups collected during the latest scan. The result is a risk assessment, not proof that signal.org is legitimate or fraudulent.
Is signal.org safe?
Independent website safety report covering the connection, domain history, browser protections, page behavior and reputation signals observed by DarkOra.
What the latest scan says about signal.org
DarkOra separates technical evidence from community opinion and explains the factors behind the score.
Valid TLS certificate observed
MarkMonitor Inc.
2 of 6 monitored headers
MDN HTTP Observatory result
Evidence that influenced the score
Review both columns. A high total score does not cancel a material caution signal.
Signals that support trust
Valid TLS certificate
The certificate is trusted, matches the hostname and is currently valid.
TLS · transport · +7 pointsHTTPS is active
The final page is delivered through an encrypted HTTPS connection.
Transport · transport · +4 pointsLong-established domain registration
Registration records indicate an age of about 25 years.
RDAP · domain · +4 pointsWebsite responded successfully
The scanned destination returned HTTP 200.
HTTP · transport · +3 pointsKey policy pages are linked
The homepage links to several policy or company-information pages.
Content · transparency · +3 pointsDomain email controls are published
The domain exposes multiple mail-routing or anti-spoofing controls.
DNS · domain · +2 pointsContact route found
The page exposes a contact or support page.
Content · transparency · +2 pointssecurity.txt is available
A security contact file was found under .well-known.
Public files · transparency · +2 pointsNormal homepage content was accessible
The scanner received a usable HTML homepage rather than an interstitial or access-control page.
Content · behavior · +2 pointsNo monitored high-risk wording detected
The accessible homepage did not contain the monitored high-pressure or credential-request phrases.
Content · behavior · +2 pointsResponsive origin server
The initial request completed in about 114 ms.
Performance · transport · +1 pointsPublic DNS resolution
The domain resolves to 4 validated public network addresses.
DNS · domain · +1 pointsNameserver redundancy
At least two authoritative nameservers were found.
DNS · domain · +1 pointsDNSSEC validation confirmed
Google Public DNS returned authenticated DNS data for this hostname.
Google Public DNS · domain · +1 pointsMIME sniffing protection is present
The response includes the x-content-type-options header.
Security headers · security · +1 pointsReferrer policy is present
The response includes the referrer-policy header.
Security headers · security · +1 pointsDescriptive page title
The homepage provides a usable browser title.
Content · transparency · +1 pointsSubstantive homepage content
The scanned page contains enough readable text to explain its purpose.
Content · transparency · +1 pointsNo hidden frames or external form targets
The accessible homepage did not expose hidden iframes or forms posting to another hostname.
Content · behavior · +1 pointsPublic routing identity found
RIPEstat mapped the address to AS13335 and prefix 104.18.0.0/20.
RIPEstat · domainSignals worth reviewing
Missing strict-transport-security
The response did not include this browser security header. Missing headers affect hardening, but do not by themselves prove fraud.
Security headers · security · -1 pointsMissing content-security-policy
The response did not include this browser security header. Missing headers affect hardening, but do not by themselves prove fraud.
Security headers · security · -1 pointsFraming protection not found
No X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors rule was detected.
Security headers · security · -1 pointsWeak MDN Observatory grade
MDN HTTP Observatory assigned grade D, indicating weak browser hardening.
MDN HTTP Observatory · security · -1 pointsMissing permissions-policy
The response did not include this browser security header. Missing headers affect hardening, but do not by themselves prove fraud.
Security headers · securityNetwork, certificate and page-level observations
These values were captured at scan time and may change after a server, DNS or certificate update.
Infrastructure footprint
- Resolved IP addresses
- 104.18.10.47, 104.18.11.47, 2606:4700::6812:a2f, 2606:4700::6812:b2f
- Authoritative nameservers
- 2
- Mail / MX records
- 5
- CAA policy
- Not found
- SPF policy
- Published
- DMARC policy
- Published
Connection security
- HTTP status
- 200
- Final protocol
- HTTPS
- Certificate validation
- Trusted and valid
- Certificate issuer
- TLS protocol / cipher
- TLSv1.3 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
- Certificate expires
- October 5, 2026
Registration context
- Approximate age
- 25.3 years
- Registered
- April 15, 2001
- Expires
- April 15, 2028
- Registrar
- MarkMonitor Inc.
- RDAP status entries
- 6
- RDAP available
- Yes
2/6 monitored protections detected
External security and reputation context
Provider failures stay separate from the base scan. DarkOra never fabricates a provider result.
DNSSEC authenticated data
The AD flag confirms that the DNS answer was validated through DNSSEC.
Response code 0 · 3 answersIndependent header grade
MDN evaluated the live HTTP security configuration independently from DarkOra.
35 points · 7/10 tests passedPreload-list status
The hostname is not currently confirmed as preloaded. This alone is not a scam indicator.
Independent transport-hardening contextRouting and origin identity
The scanned address maps to prefix 104.18.0.0/20.
BGP unconfirmed · registry presentOfficial threat-list context
The optional official Web Risk integration is not configured.
Checked Jul 27, 2026Official profile lookup
Trustpilot requires an official API key. DarkOra does not scrape profile pages.
Open Trustpilot profileResponse and redirect details
- Origin address used
- 104.18.10.47
- Server header
- cloudflare
- Content type
- text/html; charset=utf-8
- Downloaded response
- 22,194 bytes
- Redirect hops
- 0
- Initial response time
- 114 ms
What the homepage exposes
- Internal links
- 90
- External links
- 8
- External-link ratio
- 8%
- Forms detected
- 0
- Suspicious phrase groups
- 0
- Scanner methodology
- Version 4.0.0
Questions about this website safety report
Plain-language answers explain what the score can and cannot tell you.
Is signal.org safe to visit?+
The scan found a broad set of mature technical, behavioural and transparency signals. Its TLS certificate was valid at scan time. Registration records show the domain has existed for more than two years. The accessible homepage exposed a contact route and linked policy or company information. Confidence is high based on 7 distinct evidence groups collected during the latest scan. The result is a risk assessment, not proof that signal.org is legitimate or fraudulent.
What is the DarkOra score for signal.org?+
The latest DarkOra website safety score is 82 out of 100, classified as Strong trust signals. The score reflects observable technical and reputation evidence collected during the latest scan.
How is this website safety score calculated?+
DarkOra uses six independently capped areas: connection and TLS, domain maturity and DNS, browser security, identity and transparency, page behavior, and external reputation. No single signal determines the entire score.
When was signal.org last checked?+
The report was last updated on July 27, 2026. Website, DNS and certificate settings can change after this time.
Does a high score prove that signal.org is legitimate?+
No. Automated evidence can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot prove ownership, product quality or honest intent. Verify the organization, payment destination, refund terms and independent reputation before sharing sensitive information.
Reviews from DarkOra members
Account-linked reviews are screened for spam and published only after manual moderation.
No approved community review yet
Be the first member to describe a direct experience with this website.
Write a review
Sign in with your DarkOra account to submit a moderated review.
Sign in to reviewUse this report as one part of your decision. Automated checks can miss newly created threats and may flag legitimate configurations. Verify the organization, payment recipient, refund terms and independent reputation before sharing money, credentials or sensitive data.
