DarkOra.net SECURITY / PRIVACY / FORENSICS
EnglishEN
Language6 · EN
Explore products
Public services available Security / Privacy / Forensics
Featured software03
Black Matrixv4.1.0 / Windows / Linux DeGuardv1.0.0 / Windows / Linux TeleBoosterv1.0.0 / Windows / Linux
Support Explore products
Website security intelligenceHigh confidence

Is roblox.com safe?

Independent website safety report covering the connection, domain history, browser protections, page behavior and reputation signals observed by DarkOra.

https://www.roblox.com/ HTTP 200
Last analyzedSeptember 6, 2026
Evidence collected30 signals
Scan duration6,659 ms
REPORT OVERVIEW

What the latest scan says about roblox.com

DarkOra separates technical evidence from community opinion and explains the factors behind the score.

Assessment summary

The scan found a broad set of mature technical, behavioural and transparency signals. Its TLS certificate was valid at scan time. Registration records show the domain has existed for more than two years. The accessible homepage exposed a contact route and no obvious policy links. Confidence is high based on 7 distinct evidence groups collected during the latest scan. The result is a risk assessment, not proof that roblox.com is legitimate or fraudulent.

24Positive factors
6Caution factors
30Total signals
ConnectionHTTPS

Valid TLS certificate observed

Domain history22.6 years

MarkMonitor Inc.

Browser hardening50%

3 of 6 monitored headers

Independent gradeB-

MDN HTTP Observatory result

CAPTURED HOMEPAGE

Visual snapshot from the scan

https://www.roblox.com/
Screenshot of roblox.com captured during the latest DarkOra website safety scan
KEY FINDINGS

Evidence that influenced the score

Review both columns. A high total score does not cancel a material caution signal.

POSITIVE FACTORS

Signals that support trust

24

Valid TLS certificate

The certificate is trusted, matches the hostname and is currently valid.

TLS · transport · +7 points

HTTPS is active

The final page is delivered through an encrypted HTTPS connection.

Transport · transport · +4 points

Long-established domain registration

Registration records indicate an age of about 22 years.

RDAP · domain · +4 points

Website responded successfully

The scanned destination returned HTTP 200.

HTTP · transport · +3 points

Domain email controls are published

The domain exposes multiple mail-routing or anti-spoofing controls.

DNS · domain · +2 points

HSTS is present

The response includes the strict-transport-security header.

Security headers · security · +2 points

Content Security Policy is present

The response includes the content-security-policy header.

Security headers · security · +2 points

Contact route found

The page exposes a visible email address.

Content · transparency · +2 points

security.txt is available

A security contact file was found under .well-known.

Public files · transparency · +2 points

Normal homepage content was accessible

The scanner received a usable HTML homepage rather than an interstitial or access-control page.

Content · behavior · +2 points

No monitored high-risk wording detected

The accessible homepage did not contain the monitored high-pressure or credential-request phrases.

Content · behavior · +2 points

Responsive origin server

The initial request completed in about 1038 ms.

Performance · transport · +1 points

Public DNS resolution

The domain resolves to 1 validated public network address.

DNS · domain · +1 points

Nameserver redundancy

At least two authoritative nameservers were found.

DNS · domain · +1 points

Certificate authority policy

CAA records restrict which authorities may issue certificates.

DNS · domain · +1 points

Public routing identity found

RIPEstat mapped the address to AS22697 and prefix 128.116.13.0/24.

RIPEstat · domain · +1 points

Clickjacking protection

Framing is restricted through X-Frame-Options or CSP.

Security headers · security · +1 points

HSTS preload list entry

The hostname is included in Chromium’s HSTS preload status data.

Chromium HSTS Preload · security · +1 points

Descriptive page title

The homepage provides a usable browser title.

Content · transparency · +1 points

Page description is provided

The homepage includes a descriptive meta summary.

Content · transparency · +1 points

robots.txt is available

The website publishes a non-empty robots.txt file.

Public files · transparency · +1 points

Consistent canonical redirect

Redirects remain within the same domain family.

HTTP · behavior · +1 points

No hidden frames or external form targets

The accessible homepage did not expose hidden iframes or forms posting to another hostname.

Content · behavior · +1 points

Canonical URL declared

The page declares a canonical destination.

Content · transparency
CAUTION FACTORS

Signals worth reviewing

6

Policy links not found

Privacy, terms, refund or company-information links were not detected.

Content · transparency · -2 points

Some cookies lack protection

3 response cookies lacked Secure or HttpOnly attributes.

HTTP cookies · security · -1 points

Very limited page content

The homepage contains little readable text.

Content · transparency · -1 points

Missing x-content-type-options

The response did not include this browser security header. Missing headers affect hardening, but do not by themselves prove fraud.

Security headers · security

Missing referrer-policy

The response did not include this browser security header. Missing headers affect hardening, but do not by themselves prove fraud.

Security headers · security

Missing permissions-policy

The response did not include this browser security header. Missing headers affect hardening, but do not by themselves prove fraud.

Security headers · security
TECHNICAL EVIDENCE

Network, certificate and page-level observations

These values were captured at scan time and may change after a server, DNS or certificate update.

NETWORK & DNS

Infrastructure footprint

Resolved IP addresses
128.116.5.3
Authoritative nameservers
4
Mail / MX records
5
CAA policy
Published
SPF policy
Published
DMARC policy
Published
HTTPS & TLS

Connection security

HTTP status
200
Final protocol
HTTPS
Certificate validation
Trusted and valid
Certificate issuer
TLS protocol / cipher
TLSv1.3 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Certificate expires
January 5, 2027
DOMAIN RECORD

Registration context

Approximate age
22.6 years
Registered
January 30, 2004
Expires
January 30, 2027
Registrar
MarkMonitor Inc.
RDAP status entries
6
RDAP available
Yes
BROWSER SECURITY HEADERS

3/6 monitored protections detected

50%
HSTSmax-age=31536000
Content Security Policyreport-uri https://metrics.roblox.com/v1/csp/report?type=enforce; upgrade-insecure-requests; script…
X-Frame-OptionsSAMEORIGIN
X-Content-Type-OptionsNot detected
Referrer-PolicyNot detected
Permissions-PolicyNot detected
INDEPENDENT SIGNALS

External security and reputation context

Provider failures stay separate from the base scan. DarkOra never fabricates a provider result.

GOOGLE PUBLIC DNSNot validated

DNSSEC authenticated data

The provider answered, but authenticated DNSSEC data was not confirmed.

Response code 0 · 1 answers
MDN HTTP OBSERVATORYB-

Independent header grade

MDN evaluated the live HTTP security configuration independently from DarkOra.

65 points · 8/12 tests passed
CHROMIUM HSTS PRELOADPreloaded

Preload-list status

Browsers can enforce HTTPS before the first network request.

Independent transport-hardening context
RIPESTAT NETWORKAS22697

Routing and origin identity

The scanned address maps to prefix 128.116.13.0/24.

BGP present · registry present
GOOGLE WEB RISK—

Official threat-list context

The optional official Web Risk integration is not configured.

Checked Sep 7, 2026
TRUSTPILOT—

Official profile lookup

Trustpilot requires an official API key. DarkOra does not scrape profile pages.

Open Trustpilot profile
HTTP DELIVERY

Response and redirect details

Origin address used
128.116.13.3
Server header
public-gateway
Content type
text/html; charset=utf-8
Downloaded response
62,493 bytes
Redirect hops
1
Initial response time
1,038 ms
CONTENT FOOTPRINT

What the homepage exposes

Internal links
0
External links
0
External-link ratio
0%
Forms detected
0
Suspicious phrase groups
0
Scanner methodology
Version 4.0.0
REPORT GUIDANCE

Questions about this website safety report

Plain-language answers explain what the score can and cannot tell you.

Is roblox.com safe to visit?+

The scan found a broad set of mature technical, behavioural and transparency signals. Its TLS certificate was valid at scan time. Registration records show the domain has existed for more than two years. The accessible homepage exposed a contact route and no obvious policy links. Confidence is high based on 7 distinct evidence groups collected during the latest scan. The result is a risk assessment, not proof that roblox.com is legitimate or fraudulent.

What is the DarkOra score for roblox.com?+

The latest DarkOra website safety score is 86 out of 100, classified as Strong trust signals. The score reflects observable technical and reputation evidence collected during the latest scan.

How is this website safety score calculated?+

DarkOra uses six independently capped areas: connection and TLS, domain maturity and DNS, browser security, identity and transparency, page behavior, and external reputation. No single signal determines the entire score.

When was roblox.com last checked?+

The report was last updated on September 6, 2026. Website, DNS and certificate settings can change after this time.

Does a high score prove that roblox.com is legitimate?+

No. Automated evidence can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot prove ownership, product quality or honest intent. Verify the organization, payment destination, refund terms and independent reputation before sharing sensitive information.

MORE WEBSITE REPORTS

Recently completed safety checks

Only completed reports that passed DarkOra’s publication threshold are linked here.

Strong trust signals

bbc.com

92/10029 signals
Strong trust signals

cisa.gov

84/10030 signals
Strong trust signals

owasp.org

88/10027 signals
Strong trust signals

openstreetmap.org

90/10029 signals
COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE

Reviews from DarkOra members

Account-linked reviews are screened for spam and published only after manual moderation.

No approved community review yet

Be the first member to describe a direct experience with this website.

SHARE A DIRECT EXPERIENCE

Write a review

Use this report as one part of your decision. Automated checks can miss newly created threats and may flag legitimate configurations. Verify the organization, payment recipient, refund terms and independent reputation before sharing money, credentials or sensitive data.